VIEWPOINT- South African farmers make a substantial contribution to the economy-

VIEWPOINT- South African farmers make a substantial contribution to the economy-

User Rating: 5 / 5

Star ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar Active
 

South African farmers make a substantial contribution to the economy-

South African farmers make a substantial contribution to the economy through taxes, food production, and employment, yet the level of support and infrastructure they receive in return is often limited. Many operate under difficult conditions, including unreliable electricity from Eskom, deteriorating water and road infrastructure, and inconsistent agricultural support services.

As a result, farmers are frequently forced to invest their own capital into essentials like energy, water systems, and security—costs that would typically be supported by functional public infrastructure. This creates a growing gap between what farmers contribute to the country and what they receive in return, placing increasing pressure on the sustainability of the sector.

Corruption is a central driver behind many of the challenges facing South African farmers, turning otherwise manageable issues into full-blown crises. Billions of rands allocated for infrastructure, maintenance, and agricultural support are often lost through corrupt tenders, mismanagement, and cadre deployment, leaving critical systems like electricity, water, roads, and veterinary services in decline.

At Eskom, years of corruption and state capture have led to load shedding, forcing farmers to spend heavily on alternative energy and increasing production costs. In the water sector, failing municipal systems and widespread mismanagement result in severe losses of treated water and unreliable irrigation, even during periods of adequate rainfall. Disease control failures—especially around Foot-and-Mouth Disease—have triggered export bans and movement restrictions, further damaging the agricultural sector.

These issues are compounded by high crime levels, policy uncertainty (particularly around land reform), excessive bureaucracy, and rising input costs. While incompetence and poor policy also play a role, corruption remains the key factor undermining both commercial and emerging farmers.

Despite these pressures, South Africa remains largely food secure due to the resilience of its commercial farming sector. However, warning signs are clear: rising food prices, increasing reliance on imports, declining farmer numbers, and ongoing food insecurity among millions. Without decisive action to eliminate corruption and ensure funds are properly used, the long-term sustainability of the country’s agricultural sector—and its food security—remains at serious risk.

From a South African perspective, the livestock sector is facing particularly urgent pressures. Rising feed costs combined with drought-stressed grazing are intensifying the difficulties already confronting both communal and commercial farmers. At the same time, persistent Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) outbreaks continue to severely restrict market access and limit herd productivity.This challenging combination of factors raises critical questions for the industry.
How will the dual impact of drought pressure and FMD-related movement restrictions reshape livestock management strategies in the months ahead? What practical measures should farmers and authorities prioritise to strengthen biosecurity, curb the further spread of FMD, and maintain herd resilience in the face of high global input costs and ongoing climate stress? 
The Directorate of Animal Health’s lack of capacity, responsibility, and urgency is what has led South Africa into the current Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) crisis. 

Government involvement in South African agriculture has been increasing over time, it is highly profitable the past years and  because it is strategically critical for food security, land reform, and economic stability. Policies, regulations, and administrative controls—from water rights to disease management such as Foot-and-Mouth Disease—are playing a growing role in how farmers operate.

Farmers need to stay informed and aware of these shifts. Increasing bureaucracy, policy uncertainty, and inefficiencies in state institutions like Eskom can directly impact productivity, costs, and long-term viability.

The key issue is not simply government “interest in profits,” but the expanding influence over the agricultural environment—often without the efficiency or support systems needed to match it.

What farmers need is not handouts, but reliable infrastructure and effective services—stable electricity from Eskom, properly maintained water systems, functional roads, and efficient veterinary and disease-control programmes such as those addressing Foot-and-Mouth Disease.

Without these basics, farmers are forced to carry the burden themselves, increasing costs and reducing productivity. If agriculture is expected to sustain national food security, then consistent, well-managed government support and infrastructure are essential.

DISCLAIMER

The views and opinions expressed in this program are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of any entities they represent. The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by CRA and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.